In a response to the European Commission’s “Targeted Consultation Document: Implementation of the Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation (SFDR)”, ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) and CISI (the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment) say that the EC has an opportunity to influence wider global regulations including SEC greenwashing rules, using the lessons learnt from the SFDR and other jurisdictions’ regulatory successes in this space.
ACCA and CISI have stated that to ensure effective regulation, the SFDR needs greater guidance and clarification. The response was informed by the two bodies’ policy positions, sustainability focused engagement across the EU and UK, and roundtable discussion.
Commenting on this, ACCA policy and insights lead, Jessica Bingham, said: “We recognise that SFDR has driven increased transparency for investors, enabling them to make informed decisions based on the sustainability practices of asset managers and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) characteristics of investments.
“It has led to greater accountability for asset managers and a stronger emphasis on ESG integration in investment decision-making processes. As we shift to genuine impact investment, asset managers are now recognising the value of impact investing as a means to fulfil their fiduciary duty to investors, while also contributing to societal and environmental progress.”
However, adhering to the SFDR’s extensive disclosure requirements can be costly for asset managers, as it requires gathering and analysing vast amounts of ESG data, developing and implementing new reporting systems, and training staff on the regulation’s intricacies. This can put a strain on asset managers’ budgets and limit their resources for other critical initiatives. In some scenarios this has led to sustainability being the first area to cut.
CISI senior adviser, George Littlejohn, further said: “ACCA and CISI question the extent of positive impact that the SFDR’s mandatory disclosure requirements have had. We believe that in many ways the nature of the regulation has hindered some firms as opposed to inspiring better practice and investment.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalData“Despite its positive impacts, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) has also been met with some criticism and concerns.”
The SFDR relies on the availability of high-quality, consistent ESG data to effectively inform investor decision-making and evaluate asset managers’ sustainability practices. However, the current state of ESG data is often fragmented, inconsistent, and lacking standardised definitions. This can make it difficult for asset managers to accurately assess their ESG exposure and report on their performance.
ACCA and CISI have acknowledged that this will improve over time, and the introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive will assist in taking significant strides in the right direction. However, there will continue to be a heavy reliance on estimates and challenges will remain in gathering, measuring and analysing non-financial data. This translates across the non-financial reporting sphere and both ACCA and CISI recognise their role in assisting their members through this transition to ensure relevant capacity building and upskilling.
The current SFDR has been a first move in establishing criteria to combat greenwashing. However it is not at present fulfilling its potential to be effective in promoting sustainable finance. ACCA and CISI urged the EC to consider steps such as:
- Adopt a transition-focused approach to the SFDR.
- Introduce more labels for different types of sustainable investments.
- Phase in the implementation of the SFDR over time.
- Create more flexibility in the SFDR.
- Reassess the hierarchy of the labels.
- Move beyond climate-focused sustainability.
This could enable a more sustainable financial system that aligns with the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals.
